Tana

#PKM

Hello, Tana!

(2023-08-07) Just got early access to Tana. My first impressions:

Having played with Logseq, Tana's design philosophy is now very clear. I am on my way to try implementing my glossary/terminology management/lookup system.

Logseq's live query sucks. In comparison, from the way it looks, Tana's gonna rock in that department.

At a glance

Pros

Enforces structured/semantic data

AI integration

Cons

Tana's web publishing works only through "workspace." Too much remains to be seen. I won't give up the current free and working Obsidian publishing solution for something this unknown.

#Glasp

Which Is The Best? Tana or Obsidian?

Metadata

Highlights & Notes


Stian Horklev

#people

Video: Intro of Tana straight from the horse's mouth: Stian Horklev

src: 回到Axton

Tana Paste

Markdown-like input text into Tana structures.


Ev Chapman

#people

!600

In 8 minutes' short video, E did a wonderful job getting me sold on Tana's main feature: Notion-like semantic structure.


CortexFutura

#people


Santi Younger

#people
Video: Interviewing Riccardo Busetti

Fred Jame

#people
#paste/b
src

這兩天花最多時間做的事是深入玩Tana和AI功能的整合。雖然還不是很完整,但Tana的資料使用彈性和AI整合深度大概贏Notion有5個馬身。

但如果這些功能用不到,只是單純的做筆記,兩者的差異就沒那麼大,甚至Notion還簡單一點(會說Notion「簡單一點」,就知道Tana有多強)。

但Tana的弱點在於:

  1. 資料的展現方式(字體變化、排版等等)遠不如Notion

  2. 缺乏與外部資料(行事曆、通訊錄、其他SaaS等)的連結整合

  3. 資料很難變成共通格式(PDF之類)跟其他軟體共享、或用於列印

  4. 用於收集資料(錄音、照相、辨識文字)的手機版Tana Capture工具很好用,錄到的聲音可以在網頁版上轉成正確度相當高的文字檔(中文也可以),但目前還沒有行動app,只能用在行動裝置上很難用的網頁版。